The NHS assessment is complex by design. Without precise medical evidence mapped to specific criteria, even the most valid cases are rejected.
Our proprietary AI scans thousands of pages of GP notes and hospital records to find the "hidden" evidence that wins cases.
Rules vary between the 42 Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in England. We maintain a live database of local trends, success rates, and assessor preferences to tailor your application.
A structured journey from uncertainty to advocacy.
11 questions, 30-day Action Plan. A professional initial audit of your case's viability.
Our AI Engine analyzes 1,000+ pages of records to produce a 40-page Case Strength Report.
AI Report Generation
Human expert review & Checklist Evidence Pack prepared for the formal MDT meeting.
Dedicated Case Advocate
Representation during the MDT and, if necessary, strategic handling of the appeal process.
Expert representation for multi-disciplinary team meetings.
Most families arrive at CHC in a crisis: a hospital discharge, a sudden fee increase, or a refusal that does not match what they see every day. Our workflow is built for that reality. We focus on turning scattered records and lived experience into a structured case that follows the NHS framework, so your evidence is clear before the Checklist, before the MDT, and before any appeal.
We start with the source material that assessors rely on: GP notes, hospital discharge letters, care plans, daily logs, risk assessments, medication charts, and family observations. Missing evidence is a major reason valid claims fail, so the first stage is about coverage and chronology, not guesswork.
The Evidence Engine tags records against all 12 DST domains, then highlights severity, interaction, and unpredictability patterns. This is where the case moves from narrative to structure: instead of “Mum has declined quickly,” you get domain-specific evidence that explains what changed, when it changed, and why it matters for eligibility.
A team member reviews the output, checks wording for assessor-facing clarity, and prepares the final pack. We keep the reviewer panel anonymous while members remain in active regulated roles, but every case is quality-checked before delivery so families are not left relying on raw AI output.
Your final materials are designed for practical use in real meetings: a domain-led summary, supporting narrative, and clear next actions. Families use the output to request assessments, challenge underscoring, and prepare for review stages. We do not promise outcomes, because no ethical service can do that. What we do provide is a stronger, better-organized case that reflects the legal test actually used in CHC decisions.
Manual record review takes weeks. Our AI Evidence Engine processes history in minutes, catching nuances humans often miss.
Traditional legal advocates charge upwards of £3,000. Our structured tiering starts at just £47 for professional-grade reporting.
| Feature | CareAdvocate | Others |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | £47 - £597 | £3,000+ |
| Processing Time | 48 Hours | 3-4 Weeks |
| Evidence Base | 1,000+ Pages (AI) | Manual Scan |
| ICB Mapping | Local Intelligence | One-size-fits-all |
